Quick Summary
AI can summarize notes and answer questions, but it cannot replace empathy or clinical judgment. Responsible design keeps humans in the loop. Aether provides context and transparency so AI serves the relationship, not the other way around.
What we gain and what we risk
AI can analyze scans in seconds and summarize chart notes. But if a system recommends a treatment, who explains the reasoning, and who carries the duty of care? Technology can support care. It cannot replace trust.
The limits of algorithmic empathy
Language models can sound caring, but they do not care. They lack lived experience and moral accountability. Replacing a human conversation with predictive text risks turning care into a transaction.
Designing for the human loop
- Make AI reasoning visible and reviewable.
- Let clinicians correct and override outputs.
- Inform patients when AI is used in their care.
Aether follows these principles. The Aether Health Graph provides a structured timeline and audit trails so people can see how insights were produced and used.
Sources and further reading
- The Guardian: The human cost of algorithmic care
- AMA: Augmented intelligence in medicine
- WHO: Ethics and governance of AI for health
Information only. Not medical advice.
Next steps
- Use Aether to organize records and add context to care decisions.
- Share a read only timeline with your clinician before visits.
- Prefer tools that show how AI suggestions were generated.